1/ Trump approved the release of the Nunes memo after first attacking both the FBI and the Justice Department in an early-morning tweet. He accused them of having “politicized the sacred investigative process in favor of Democrats.” The memo, which alleges anti-Trump bias at the FBI and DOJ, was approved for release without the redactions that the FBI and the Justice Department had lobbied for. The House Intelligence Committee then made the memo public. Trump told reporters, “I think it’s a disgrace what’s happening in our country … A lot of people should be ashamed of themselves and much worse than that.” (New York Times / Washington Post)
The top Leadership and Investigators of the FBI and the Justice Department have politicized the sacred investigative process in favor of Democrats and against Republicans - something which would have been unthinkable just a short time ago. Rank & File are great people!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 2, 2018
The memo didn’t provide the evidence to support the claim that the FBI abused its surveillance power under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act during the 2016 campaign leading to “a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.”
The memo also doesn’t provide all the evidence the FBI and Justice Department used to obtain the initial warrant to surveil Carter Page, the former Trump campaign adviser.
The memo confirms that actions taken by George Papadopoulos, the former Trump foreign policy adviser, were a factor in the opening of the investigation. Papadopoulos pleaded guilty last year to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russians.
Memo actually confirms a timeline not favorable to Trump:— Glenn Kessler (@GlennKesslerWP) February 2, 2018
1. Counterintelligence probe opened in July 2016 by FBI because of George P./Wikileaks/emails.
2. FISA application on Carter Page obtained late Oct. 2016, after Page had left Trump campaign.
Sean Hannity advised Trump on the memo all week. Trump reportedly had several phone calls with Hannity over the last few weeks, reinforcing Trump’s determination to release the memo to the public. (The Daily Beast)
Comey praised the FBI in a tweet for speaking up against “weasels and liars”. He called on more leaders in the government to do the same. (The Hill)
All should appreciate the FBI speaking up. I wish more of our leaders would. But take heart: American history shows that, in the long run, weasels and liars never hold the field, so long as good people stand up. Not a lot of schools or streets named for Joe McCarthy.— James Comey (@Comey) February 1, 2018
John McCain: “The latest attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice serve no American interests – no party’s, no president’s, only Putin’s.” (The Hill)
2/ Yesterday, Paul Ryan said the memo is not “an indictment of the FBI, of the Department of Justice” and that he supports the release of the Democrats’ memo, which counters the GOP memo. Republican leaders in Congress have been arguing that the release of the memo reveals mistakes and bias at the FBI – not Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation set up by the Justice Department. Trump undermined that argument with his tweet saying the memo would prove political bias at the FBI and Justice Department. (The Hill / Washington Post)
3/ Trump refused to say if he will fire Rod Rosenstein, who has been overseeing Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation. “You figure that one out,” Trump told reporters, when asked if he has confidence in Rosenstein. (CNN)
4/ Two attorneys representing clients caught up in Robert Mueller’s probe believe Mueller could indict Trump for obstruction of justice. Many legal experts don’t believe Mueller has the standing to bring criminal charges against Trump, however. Neither attorney had specific knowledge of Mueller’s plans, but suggested that could try to bring an indictment against Trump if only to illustrate the gravity of his findings. (Politico)
5/ The Trump administration called for the development of two new, “lower-yield” types of nuclear weapons for ballistic and cruise missiles launched from submarines. The weapons could be used to respond to “extreme circumstances,” including non-nuclear attacks. The White House also publicly acknowledged for the first time that Russia is “developing” a “new intercontinental, nuclear armed, nuclear-powered, undersea autonomous torpedo.” (Politico)
6/ The White House wants to see more options for a military strike against North Korea, and is frustrated by what they consider to be the Pentagon’s unwillingness to provide them. The national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster ,believes threats are only credible if they are backed by well-developed military plans, but sources say the Pentagon is worried that the White House is too eager to use military action against the Korean Peninsula. (New York Times)
Seven of the top nine jobs at the State Department are empty, including positions to oversee the agency’s role in trade policy, stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, refugee issues, and efforts to counter human trafficking. (Bloomberg)
K.T. McFarland asked to withdraw her stalled nomination to be the U.S. ambassador to Singapore. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee was concerned about her testimony to Congress over communications with Russia. (Reuters)
CIA Director Mike Pompeo met with the head of Russia’s foreign intelligence agency, even though the head of the GRU was barred from entering the US under sanctions put in place in 2014. Pompeo defended the meeting and claimed that he and other officials only met with the Russian operatives “to keep Americans safe.” The Russian Embassy in Washington announced the meeting with Pompeo in a tweet on January 30th. (CNN)
The director of Russia’s foreign intelligence, Sergey Naryshkin, has visited the United States for consultations with #US🇺🇸 counterparts on the struggle against terrorism - Ambassador #Antonov— Russian Embassy in USA 🇷🇺 (@RusEmbUSA) January 30, 2018
Become a member.
Help keep WTF Just Happened Today going with a small contribution.